Supreme Court upholds ban on 'two genders' student shirt

HEAVILY 70% 30%   Tuesday, May 27, 2025, 10:16 am

The Supreme Court has opted not to review an appeal regarding a Massachusetts school’s decision to ban a student’s “only two genders” shirt, thus upholding the existing ruling. The decision, while steeped in legal technicalities, spotlights continuing tensions over dress codes and free expression in schools—proof that even clothing can ignite controversy.

foxnews.com / Supreme Court declines to review free speech case involving student who wore 'only two genders' shirt

The Supreme Court allowed a federal ruling to stand that found that a Massachusetts public school was justified in banning a student who wore shirts criticizing the transgender movement.

theepochtimes.com / Supreme Court Won’t Hear Student’s Challenge to School Ban on ‘Two Genders’ Shirt

A federal appeals court upheld the ban despite a prior Supreme Court ruling, lawyers argued.

oann.com / La Corte Suprema rechaza el caso de la prohibición de la camiseta “Sólo hay dos géneros” en las escuelas

Los dos jueces conservadores, Clarence Thomas y Samuel Alito, señalaron que habrían revisado el caso del estudiante en Middleborough, Massachusetts, afirmando que los tribunales inferiores no estaban siguiendo la Primera Enmienda.

oann.com / SCOTUS declines case on student’s ‘There are only two genders’ shirt ban case in school

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a student’s challenge after his school district blocked him from wearing a t-shirt that read “There are only two genders.” 

bloomberg.com / US Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Student’s ‘Two Genders’ Shirt - Bloomberg.com

US Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Student’s ‘Two Genders’ Shirt  Bloomberg.com

cnn.com / Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore ‘two genders’ shirt to school - CNN

Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore ‘two genders’ shirt to school  CNN


permalink / 6 stories from sources in 5 days ago #supremecourt #culture #legal #education




More Top Stories...


Senate split deepens over contentious healthcare megabill debate

Lawmakers are locked in a high-stakes standoff over the new healthcare megabill. As Medicaid moderates hold crucial sway and Republican senators cast doubts, partisan divisions intensify. This legislative tug-of-war could reshape national healthcare policies, leaving critics shaking their heads at the chaos. More...


Controversial One Big Beautiful Bill Ignites Fiscal Outrage and Debate

The flagship tax-and-spending proposal backed by President Trump has come under fire after revelations of a contentious paragraph that could hike deficits by $2.3 trillion over a decade. Critics and fiscal watchdogs are questioning the bill’s hidden costs as GOP allies launch a high-stakes lobbying effort to shore up support. More...


Trump’s Tariff Strategy Faces Unprecedented Legal Scrutiny

President Trump’s aggressive tariff policy is now under judicial fire as conservative legal scholars and critics from across the aisle decry the president’s unilateral moves. Courts have begun challenging the statutory basis for these steep import duties, forcing a constitutional debate that underscores the limits of executive power. More...


Trump Steel Tariff Hike Drives Metal Market Surge

In a bold move shaking the financial markets, President Trump doubled steel tariffs, propelling U.S. aluminum and steel prices upward and sending stocks surging. The sharp tariff increase has prompted investors to brace for a rollercoaster of mixed impacts domestically and overseas, fueling both optimism and concern. More...


Trump-Backed Polish Presidential Victory Seals a New Chapter

In Poland’s heated election runoff, conservative candidate Karol Nawrocki—backed by Trump—narrowly clinched the presidency, marking a pivotal political shift. Observers note the unexpected yet definitive win that reshapes the nation’s political landscape, proving electoral surprises are never dull. More...



Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.